Blog Post - Gender Bias in Mediation and Conflict Resolution — Recognising and Reducing the Impact

Gender bias can derail relations by distorting fairness, silencing voices, and misjudging behaviours.

Gender Bias in Mediation and Conflict Resolution — Recognising and Reducing the Impact

by

Chris Breedon

Introduction

Gender Bias is one of the most pervasive — and often invisible — forces shaping workplace interactions. Even in organisations committed to equality, unconscious assumptions based on gender can influence decisions, behaviours, and conflict outcomes. In mediation, where impartiality and fairness are vital, the presence of gender bias can skew perspectives, silence voices, and undermine resolutions.

In this blog, we’ll explore how gender bias operates, its impact on conflict resolution, and how mediators and managers can identify, challenge, and mitigate its effects to create more equitable and effective processes.

What Is Gender Bias?

Gender Bias refers to the preferential treatment, assumptions, or judgements made based on a person’s gender. It can be explicit (open and intentional) or implicit (unconscious and subtle).

Examples include:

  • Assuming women are more emotional and less rational
  • Viewing assertive men as leaders but assertive women as aggressive
  • Believing men are naturally better at negotiation or leadership

Gender bias affects people of all genders, but it most frequently disadvantages women, particularly women of colour, transwomen, and non-binary individuals in traditionally male-dominated workplaces.

Why It Matters in Mediation and Conflict Resolution

Mediators are expected to create a balanced, neutral space. But if gender bias is at play — whether from the mediator or between parties — the process can be compromised.

1. Disproportionate Credibility

Men may be assumed to be more competent or credible, which can result in their arguments being taken more seriously in mediation.

2. Emotional Framing

Women’s emotional expressions may be pathologised — seen as irrational or unprofessional — while men’s anger may be viewed as justified or assertive.

3. Undervalued Contribution

In workplace conflicts, women may find their perspectives minimised or overlooked, especially in mixed-gender disputes.

Real-Life Example: The Performance Review Mediation

Scenario:
A senior female software engineer in a tech company was given a negative performance review by her male manager, who described her as “too abrasive in meetings” and “not a team player.” She contested the review and requested mediation.

What Unfolded:
In the mediation, it emerged that her style was direct and solution-focused —similar to her male colleagues — but only her behaviour was labelled negatively. The male manager unconsciously associated leadership with traditionally male behaviours and collaboration with feminine softness.

Outcome:
The mediator helped both parties unpack their assumptions. The manager acknowledged the inconsistency in how he evaluated communication styles. Following mediation, the company introduced unconscious bias training for all team leads.

Mediators create a safe space to explore the issues and unpick assumptions and bias

How Gender Bias Affects Managers

Managers play a central role in preventing, escalating, or resolving workplace disputes. If a manager operates under gendered assumptions, their behaviour can include:

  • Assuming women will handle “soft” interpersonal issues
  • Assigning difficult tasks to men without discussion
  • Offering mentorship more readily to male team members

This not only affects conflict outcomes, but also long-term professional development and morale and ultimately retention and productivity.

How Mediators Can Identify Gender Bias

Mediators should look out for:

  • Gendered language (e.g., "emotional", "bossy", "hysterical", "overly ambitious")
  • Differences in how the same behaviour is framed depending on gender
  • Power dynamics where one party dominates discussion or is deferentially treated

Practical Exercises: Addressing Gender Bias

Exercise 1: Language Awareness Audit

Objective: Identify and remove gendered assumptions in workplace communications.
Instructions:

  • Review a set of past performance reviews or meeting notes.
  • Highlight descriptions or feedback related to behaviour or personality.
  • Ask: Would I use the same words to describe someone of another gender?

Example:
If a woman is described as “too assertive,” would a man with the same behaviour be called “confident” instead?

Exercise 2: Role Reversal Reflection

Objective: Reveal unconscious double standards.
Instructions:

  • In conflict scenarios, switch the genders of each party and reflect.
  • How does this affect your perception of who is right, who is aggressive, or who is fair?

Example:
A woman confronts her male peer in a meeting — do you interpret her behaviour differently than if the roles were reversed?

Exercise 3: Meeting Participation Tracker

Objective: Assess gender balance in team dynamics.
Instructions:

  • During a meeting, note who speaks, for how long, and who is interrupted.
  • Tally interruptions by gender and review if women are less heard.

Insight:
Often, women are interrupted more and have their ideas credited to male colleagues.

Real-Life Example: Gender Bias in Disciplinary Action

Scenario:
In a local council office, two employees got into a heated dispute. The woman was reprimanded for being “overly emotional,” while the man was seen as “passionately defending his point.”

Bias in Play:
The same behaviour was framed differently based on gendered expectations. The disciplinary report mirrored these stereotypes, and the woman was placed under performance review.

Mediation Outcome:
The mediator encouraged the parties to reflect on the language used and assumptions made. HR later reviewed its disciplinary policy to ensure fairness and remove biased descriptors.

Strategies for Mediators and Managers

1. Challenge Language in the Room

When one party uses gendered language (e.g. ,“she’s bossy”), gently ask:

“Can you describe what she did specifically that felt bossy to you?”

This invites clearer, behaviour-based discussion and removes stereotypes.

2. Use Gender-Neutral Descriptors

Avoid words that carry gendered weight and focus on:

  • Specific behaviours (“interrupted others three times”)
  • Observable outcomes (“missed three deadlines”)
  • Impact-based feedback (“this affected team morale”)

3. Ensure Equal Air Time

Mediators can tactfully intervene to give under represented voices more space:

“Let’s pause here and hear from [name] — I’d like to make sure both voices are heard equally.”

4. Train the Team

Offer bias-awareness training for managers. The more informed they are, the less likely they’ll allow unconscious bias to drive decisions.

Team training is essential if organisations are to address bias

Gender Bias Is Not Always Obvious

It’s important to understand that gender bias is often subtle:

  • Men being chosen to lead presentations because they're seen as more confident
  • Women being asked to take notes or plan the office birthday party
  • Men being assumed to be more capable under pressure

Each of these actions, though seemingly small, contributes to systemic inequality.

Intersectionality: Gender and More

Gender bias doesn’t exist in isolation. It intersects with race, age, disability, and more. For example:

  • A Black woman may be stereotyped as “angry” when being direct
  • A young female manager may be dismissed as “inexperienced” more readily than a male counterpart

Mediators and managers must consider the intersectional nature of bias when assessing disputes.

Final Thought: Bias Awareness is a Leadership Skill

Recognising gender bias isn’t about policing thought — it’s about promoting fairness. For managers and mediators, the ability to detect and defuse gendered assumptions is not just ethical, but essential.

If we want equitable workplaces, we need to create equitable processes — and that starts with seeing people as individuals, not stereotypes.

Summary

  • Gender bias can derail mediation by distorting fairness, silencing voices, and misjudging behaviours.
  • Real-life examples show how implicit biases affect women and men.
  • Mediators and managers must use inclusive language, ensure equal participation, and challenge assumptions.
  • Practical exercises can help develop bias awareness at both individual and organisational levels.